Florida surgeon removes a patient's prostate from 35 miles away in first US telerobotic surgery

Dr. Vipul Patel controlled a surgical robot remotely to operate on a 66-year-old man in Minneola while sitting in suburban Orlando. The procedure required an FDA exemption, and cybersecurity and connectivity risks are still being assessed.
A surgical robot arm positioned over an operating table in a hospital operating room
Photo by Piron Guillaume on Unsplash
Share

Mark, a 66-year-old man with a cancerous prostate, was in an operating room in Minneola while Dr. Vipul Patel controlled a surgical robot from suburban Orlando, 35 miles away.

Patel, the founder and medical director of the Global Robotics Institute at AdventHealth, remotely operated the robot to remove Mark’s cancerous prostate in a prostatectomy. A fellow surgeon remained in the operating room to monitor Mark as the robotic operation went ahead.

AdventHealth said the procedure was the first telerobotic surgery of its kind attempted fully in the US. The operation was completed successfully, and Mark is still doing well, according to AdventHealth.

The case followed 10 investigational telesurgeries between Orlando, Florida and Luanda, Angola, which tested the concept of operating across a distance. The Food and Drug Administration granted an exemption allowing the fully US-based telerobotic prostatectomy to proceed.

The exemption reflects the procedure’s experimental status. AdventHealth said a successful operation does not mean the FDA has deemed the procedure safe.

The operation also carries the risks associated with a normal prostatectomy. Cybersecurity risks and the possibility of connectivity failure are still being evaluated.

“For generations, access to highly specialized care has often depended on where a patient lives,” Patel said.

“This study allows us to evaluate whether telesurgery could one day help reduce geographic barriers to specialized treatment,” he said.

Sources (1)

Topics

Samuel BoatengHealth

Samuel Boateng scrutinises medical claims for the strength of the evidence behind them. Exacting, plain-spoken, and quick to separate a real result from a hopeful headline.

Comments (0)