A Brooklyn Childhood Built Around Work
Howard Schultz grew up on the seventh floor of Brooklyn’s Bayview Houses, in a cramped two-bedroom apartment where about 150 families shared one small elevator. The building stood in Canarsie, and the Schultz family moved there in 1956, when Howard was three years old, according to the Horatio Alger Association. Every trip downstairs required the same small calculation: wait for the elevator, squeeze in, and join the daily traffic of a building full of families living close together.
Inside that apartment, Schultz was the oldest of three children, and the household ran on the work his parents could find. His father, Fred, was a World War II veteran who had never finished high school and moved through blue-collar jobs as a cabbie, truck driver and factory worker. His mother, Elaine, worked as a receptionist. The family’s circumstances gave ordinary paychecks a central place in daily life, a reality Schultz would later describe through his father’s work and its limits. CNBC reported that Fred Schultz never earned more than $20,000 a year.
That world put work in front of Schultz early. At 12, he started a paper route, taking on a job while he was still a child in Bayview. By 16, he was commuting to Manhattan’s garment district, where he worked for a furrier stretching animal skins for five cents apiece, as the Horatio Alger Association recounts. The job carried its own plain arithmetic: each skin brought five cents, and every dollar required another piece of work done by hand.
Those early jobs belonged to a household where labor was concrete and close at hand. Fred’s changing jobs showed how unstable a living could feel, while Elaine’s work at a desk offered another version of the same responsibility: show up, earn what the week requires, keep the household moving. Schultz’s paper route and garment-district work placed him inside that rhythm long before he had a career to pursue.
Bayview gave that rhythm a physical shape. The small apartment, the crowded building and the single elevator formed the setting for a boy who saw work as part of family life, then began to do it himself. Before Seattle, coffee, or the company that would define his public life, there was this seventh-floor home and the steady lesson it delivered: progress began with getting up and going to work.
Football Carried Him to College
That daily habit of showing up found a larger stage at Canarsie High School, where Schultz became quarterback for a football team drawn from a student body of nearly 6,000. The role gave him a visible place in a very large school, and it put him in front of a recruiter from Northern Michigan University, who offered him a scholarship to play football, according to the Horatio Alger Association. For a young man whose family life had been organized around hourly work and narrow margins, the offer opened a route toward a campus far from Brooklyn.
He took it. Schultz attended Northern Michigan University from 1971 to 1975, studying communications while football paid the way, and he emerged with a degree that carried a particular weight at home. He became the first person in his family to graduate from college, earning his communications degree in 1975 on a full football scholarship, as CNBC reported. The milestone belonged to him, yet it also widened the horizon for a family whose working life had unfolded through jobs that depended on the next shift.
College gave Schultz credentials and a new setting; sales gave him a practical way to use both. After graduation, he joined Xerox’s sales division and spent three years there, according to the Horatio Alger Association. The work moved him from the physical labor he had known as a boy into a business where attention had value: who was buying, what they needed, and how a salesperson could earn the chance to explain an idea. Communications became less an academic subject than a working tool, useful in a conversation with someone who had a reason to listen and a reason to hesitate.
That shift matters because Schultz’s later career would repeatedly turn on the same sequence: spot an unusual signal, pursue the question behind it, then persuade other people to see what he saw. Football had carried him to the degree, and the degree had carried him into sales. Soon, one customer order would give those instincts a direction.
Five Stores and an Unusually Large Order
That direction appeared in 1981, while Schultz was working for Hammarplast, a Swedish housewares company that sold drip coffeemakers. One customer kept placing unusually large orders: Starbucks Coffee, Tea, and Spice. Schultz had learned to treat a pattern in the numbers as the beginning of a conversation, so he wanted to see the company behind the orders for himself. The trip carried him from a sales question to Seattle, where the answer came in the form of a small, intensely focused coffee business.
At the time, Starbucks was a 10-year-old retailer with five stores, 85 employees, a roasting facility and a wholesale operation that sold coffee beans to local Seattle merchants, according to the Horatio Alger Association. Its footprint was modest, yet its orders suggested a company with a serious appetite for the equipment that helped people make coffee at home. That contrast gave Schultz a reason to look closer. He was seeing a business through the evidence it left behind, then testing the evidence in person.
The visit turned a customer account into a professional opening. Schultz moved to Seattle and joined Starbucks in 1982 as director of retail operations and marketing, a role that put him inside the company whose buying habits had first caught his attention, as CNBC reports. The move also placed him at a useful scale: Starbucks was large enough to have a roasting facility, employees and a wholesale business, while still small enough for a new executive to grasp the whole operation in view.
That vantage point mattered. Schultz had arrived through the practical route of sales and marketing, following an order that looked out of proportion to the size of the buyer. Once inside Starbucks, he could begin to ask a larger question about what people might want from coffee itself. The company had given him the setting; the next discovery would give him an idea for changing it.
The Product Was Coffee. The Discovery Was the Coffeehouse.
That discovery came in Milan in 1983, where Schultz encountered the Italian espresso bar and found a city with 1,500 coffeehouses, according to Britannica. The number gave shape to an idea that a coffee business could organize itself around the visit as much as the bean. In these bars, coffee created a reason to pause, talk, return and belong to the rhythm of a neighborhood.
Schultz carried that rhythm back to Seattle because it answered the larger question he had begun asking inside Starbucks. A store could sell coffee beans and equipment, yet an espresso bar offered a place where people could spend part of the day. Years later, Starbucks would market that role as a “third place” between home and work, as recorded by FixQuotes. The phrase was simple, and its power lay in the practical promise behind it: coffee could anchor a familiar stop in the hours people usually passed between private life and the workplace.
That promise depended on turning an observation into something customers could actually enter, so Schultz pressed the original Starbucks founders to test the idea in their own city. In 1984, he persuaded them to open a coffee bar in downtown Seattle, according to the Horatio Alger Association. The move brought the Milan insight into a setting he knew well enough to judge, with a counter, drinks prepared for the moment and customers gathered around the experience.
For Schultz, the downtown bar made coffee feel like a social habit with a commercial home. The product remained central, yet the setting gave it a new job: it could make a brief part of an ordinary day feel shared and dependable. That early experiment also clarified the question that would soon drive his next move. If Seattle customers could make room for a coffeehouse, how far could that ritual travel?
Il Giornale Had to Be Funded One No at a Time
If Seattle customers could make room for a coffeehouse, how far could that ritual travel? Schultz wanted to build the answer himself, and when the Starbucks founders resisted the coffeehouse vision, he left in 1985 to start Il Giornale, a name that means “the newspaper” in Italian. The departure turned an idea tested in one downtown bar into a business that required cash, believers and a plan strong enough to survive a long series of closed doors.
He needed $400,000 to begin. Schultz approached 242 investors, and 217 of them rejected the proposal, according to the Howard Schultz biography. Each meeting asked someone to see value in a coffeehouse model that had yet to establish itself at scale in Seattle, so the search became its own form of proof: Schultz kept making the case until enough people agreed to put money behind it.
Two early commitments gave the venture shape. Starbucks invested $150,000, while Ron Margolis, a local doctor, added $100,000, the biography records. Schultz ultimately raised more than $1 million to open the first coffee bar, according to the Horatio Alger Association, giving Il Giornale the means to move from a pitch into a place customers could enter.
That first store opened in 1986. It carried the experience Schultz had seen in Milan and tested in Seattle into a business built around the visit itself: coffee served in a setting designed to bring people back. The opening also gave the idea a practical test, one cup and one customer at a time, and the test produced enough momentum for Il Giornale to open a second café in Seattle and a third in Vancouver, British Columbia, as the Horatio Alger Association recounts.
Those three cafés changed the terms of Schultz’s ambition. He had a company, a working model and evidence that the coffeehouse ritual could hold its shape beyond a single counter. Soon, the small business he had left behind would come back into view from the other side of the deal.
He Bought the Company That Let Him Go
That deal arrived in 1987, when Il Giornale, backed by investors, bought Starbucks and took on its name, becoming Starbucks Corp., according to Britannica. Schultz had built enough proof in three cafés to purchase the platform that could carry his idea further, and he took over as CEO with 17 store locations in hand, CNBC reports.
Seventeen locations gave the coffeehouse model room to become a company, which meant Schultz needed to decide what kind of company its employees would experience. In 1988, he committed Starbucks to health insurance for eligible full- and part-time workers, extending coverage to employees’ domestic partners as well, according to CNBC. The policy placed the people behind the counter inside the business model from the start, treating their working lives as part of the customer’s daily experience.
That commitment soon gained an ownership piece. In 1991, Starbucks began offering Bean Stock, its company stock program, making employees partners in the company, CNBC reports. The arrangement gave the expanding chain a shared stake between the people serving coffee and the company growing around them, a practical foundation for a business built on customers returning again and again.
With the purchase complete, Schultz had control of the name, the stores and the terms on which the next employees would join. The question now was whether that structure could travel, carrying the same sense of welcome from one location to the next as Starbucks began to grow.
Starbucks Scaled the Experience Alongside the Stores
That question shaped the first years of expansion, because every new Starbucks had to give customers a reason to return and employees a reason to stay. Under Schultz, the chain grew from fewer than 20 stores to more than 100 in four years, according to Britannica, turning a small group of locations into a system that had to reproduce its promise day after day.
Schultz built that system around the people serving the coffee. Eligible full- and part-time workers, including employees’ domestic partners, received health insurance, while the company’s stock program gave workers a stake in the business they were helping build. The arrangement treated the person behind the counter as part of the experience a customer came back for: a familiar face, a practiced order, a store that felt ready for the next visit.
That link between the workplace and the customer was central to Schultz’s approach. Harvard Business School describes his leadership as a combination of customer- and employee-satisfaction plans, and reports that Starbucks achieved a stronger employee-retention rate than its competitors. The school’s profile of Schultz also identifies the part-time benefits and stock options as a first for a retail company, a choice that made growth depend on a wider group of people than executives and investors alone.
As the store count climbed, that choice gave Starbucks a practical way to carry its coffeehouse idea forward. Each location could sell coffee, yet the larger goal was a repeatable visit shaped by service, familiarity and the expectation that the room would feel worth returning to. The store became a place where a transaction could settle into a habit, and those habits gave the company its momentum.
By making employee experience part of the operating model, Schultz gave expansion a human structure. That structure would soon need far more capital to reach beyond the early chain of stores, and Starbucks was approaching the moment when Wall Street could fund the next version of the ritual.
Wall Street Funded the Next Version of Starbucks
Wall Street supplied that capital on June 26, 1992, when Starbucks went public and raised $271 million, according to the Howard Schultz biography. The offering gave Schultz’s company the resources to carry its carefully built coffeehouse model into many more neighborhoods, while the central task remained familiar: make each store feel like a place people would choose to return to.
That task grew larger with remarkable speed. During Schultz’s leadership from 1987 to 2000, Starbucks expanded from 11 stores to 2,000, according to Harvard Business School. Each opening extended the same promise into a new local routine, turning a company built around a repeat visit into one that could finance, staff and manage thousands of those visits at once.
With the U.S. business widening, the company also began to carry that routine across borders. Starbucks opened its first store in China in January 1999, according to the Howard Schultz biography, a move that placed the coffeehouse idea in a market far from the Seattle stores where its modern form had taken shape. By the end of the decade, Starbucks had about 2,500 locations in roughly a dozen countries, Britannica reports.
The numbers describe growth, yet they also show the change in the founder’s assignment. Schultz had spent the earlier years proving that people would build a habit around coffee, conversation and a familiar room. Public capital let Starbucks build the systems required to carry that habit farther, from city to city and then from country to country, until the company had become large enough to ask a harder question: could a business designed around presence keep its character as its founder stepped away from the daily job?
A Company Built for Presence Had to Run Without Him
That scale raised a different question: could the company keep carrying that habit when its founder stepped away from the daily job? Schultz answered by leaving the chief executive’s office on June 1, 2000, with Orin Smith succeeding him as CEO. He remained chairman, preserving a link to the company’s direction while handing its operations to another leader, an arrangement that reflected the scale Starbucks had reached and the systems now required to sustain it.
That handoff changed the nature of Schultz’s relationship to the business he had built. For years, his work had centered on translating an idea about coffeehouses into thousands of repeatable decisions: what the stores felt like, how employees were treated, and why a customer might return tomorrow. As chairman, he could still shape the larger purpose, while someone else carried the daily responsibility of making a vast retail organization move in one direction.
His life also widened beyond coffee. From 2001 through 2006, Schultz was the majority owner of the NBA’s Seattle SuperSonics, according to Britannica. The role placed him at the center of another Seattle institution, one with its own devoted public, its own pressures and its own demands for leadership. The SuperSonics years offered a clear measure of the distance he had traveled from the small company whose unusually large coffee-machine orders had first drawn his attention.
Meanwhile, Starbucks continued to grow into an organization where every decision reached farther than it once had. By 2007, the chain had more than 15,000 locations worldwide, Britannica reports. That reach made the question of leadership more urgent. A company organized around a familiar, personal ritual now depended on consistency across an immense network of stores, employees and customers. The founder had shown that the experience could travel; the next test was whether it could hold together at this new scale, especially when the wider economy began to tighten.
In 2008, Schultz Came Back to Restore Discipline
That question brought Howard Schultz back to the chief executive’s office on January 7, 2008, in the middle of the financial crisis, succeeding Jim Donald. The task matched the scale of the company he had left behind: Starbucks had become a vast network, and Schultz returned with a stated focus on coffee quality, store discipline and culture, according to FixQuotes. Those priorities put the daily experience at the center of the recovery, from the product in the cup to the habits that shaped each store.
Store discipline carried an immediate cost. Under Schultz’s return, Starbucks closed 900 stores, a decision that showed how far the reset reached across the business, Britannica reports. Each closure reduced the network he had spent years building, yet the larger aim was to bring the remaining company back into closer alignment with the standards behind its ritual.
The financial crisis made that work more urgent, since a coffee purchase depends on customers believing that a small daily stop is still worth making. Schultz’s approach treated quality, operational focus and workplace culture as parts of the same promise: people needed a reason to return, and employees needed a clear version of the experience they were there to deliver. By 2012, Starbucks had rebounded financially, according to Britannica, turning a period of contraction into the foundation for the company’s next phase.
A Global Ritual Also Became a Public Stage
That rebound restored the force of a daily ritual that now carried meaning far beyond coffee. Every visit still began with a familiar exchange across a counter, yet the scale of Starbucks gave that exchange a public dimension, one shaped by the people in the store and the wider conversations unfolding outside it. In 2015, Schultz put that dimension directly on the cup, introducing a plan for baristas to write “Race Together” on Starbucks orders. The phrase invited a conversation about race into one of the company’s most routine moments, turning a few seconds at the register into a civic gesture. CNBC reported that Schultz ended the initiative within days, leaving a compact lesson in the difficulty of attaching a large social message to a standardized retail interaction.
That difficulty came from the same achievement that had made Starbucks so powerful. A company can build a recognizable experience across many locations, with a familiar menu, pace and vocabulary, yet each store still belongs to a particular neighborhood and each customer arrives with a different set of expectations. The cup-writing plan placed that tension in full view. It asked a company ritual to hold a conversation that people experience personally, politically and differently from one city to the next.
Three years later, a far more serious event showed how quickly that tension could become a crisis. In April 2018, a Philadelphia Starbucks manager called police on two Black men who were waiting for a business meeting. The incident centered on an ordinary scene inside a café, which made its significance immediate: the setting was supposed to provide a place where people could wait, meet and conduct a day’s business. Following the incident, Schultz closed all U.S. Starbucks locations for racial-bias training, according to CNBC. The response took the issue from one Philadelphia store to the entire American footprint, because the company’s promise depended on the experience feeling consistent wherever customers encountered it.
Those two episodes reveal the pressure inside a business built around repeat visits. Starbucks could carry an idea through its stores with extraordinary reach, whether that idea appeared in handwriting on a cup or in a companywide training decision. Reach also magnified every choice. A public message could land differently at every counter, while a single moment inside one café could raise questions about the experience everywhere else. The ritual Schultz helped build had become a shared setting for daily life, and shared settings carry obligations that expand with every store, customer and city.
The Founder’s Last Turn at the Counter
Those questions followed Starbucks into its next leadership handoff. Kevin Johnson succeeded Schultz as chief executive in April 2017, while Schultz moved into the role of executive chairman, a change that put day-to-day leadership in new hands while keeping the founder close to the company he had shaped for decades. The market registered the weight of that association: news of Schultz’s departure as CEO sent Starbucks stock down as much as 10 percent, CNBC reported. A year later, in June 2018, Schultz stepped down as executive chairman and became chairman emeritus, another formal step away from the counter he had turned into a global ritual.
That distance lasted through a period when the company’s relationship with its workers had become a central public issue. In March 2022, Starbucks announced that Schultz would return as interim CEO, arriving amid renewed labor organizing, according to FixQuotes. The appointment brought back the leader whose earlier operating model had placed employee benefits and ownership alongside the customer experience. This time, the company faced a different kind of test: the ritual remained familiar, while the terms of work inside the stores had moved to the center of the conversation.
Schultz’s interim return also came with a defined end point. On March 20, 2023, he announced that he would leave the position early, and Laxman Narasimhan took over as CEO in April 2023, the Howard Schultz biography records. The quick succession gave the company a new chief executive and left Schultz with a third period at its helm completed: chairman and CEO from 1986 to 2000, CEO again from 2008 to 2017, then interim CEO from 2022 to 2023.
His final turn captured the unusual shape of the story. A salesman had followed an unusually large coffee-machine order to a small Seattle retailer, then spent years teaching customers to treat a cup of coffee as a reason to stay. By the time Narasimhan assumed leadership, the daily visit had become larger than any one executive’s presence. It still carried Schultz’s original bet: people would return for coffee, and they would return for the feeling built around it.
Comments (0)