Evonik rejects BASF's €11.2 billion takeover bid

BASF raised its offer to €24 per share and attached commitments on jobs and sites, but Evonik's board said it would not negotiate and would stay on its own strategic course. It has offered BASF a purely informational exchange, leaving the pursuit without a formal route forward.
Evonik Industries corporate headquarters or facility exterior
Wiki05 (pd) via Wikimedia Commons
Share

Evonik’s decision to refuse negotiations leaves BASF’s €11.2B (~$12.5B) pursuit without a formal route forward, while the German chemical maker remains focused on its own strategic direction.

BASF has said a combination would make the two companies stronger against competitors from China and elsewhere, and identified Evonik as its preferred acquisition target.

BASF’s board approached Evonik last week about a voluntary public takeover offer. It raised the bid to €24 per share, valuing Evonik at €11.2 billion (~$12.5 billion), and attached extensive commitments on employees and sites.

Evonik’s board rejected the approach. It said it would not enter negotiations with BASF and would remain focused on its own plans. The company has nevertheless offered BASF a purely informational and confidential exchange.

The distinction draws a clear line around the current contact: information may be shared, while deal negotiations are off the table.

BASF said it was surprised that Evonik would not engage in formal negotiations. Markus Kamieth, BASF’s chief executive, said on the company’s earnings conference call this week that it was weighing other acquisition opportunities.

Evonik is Germany’s second-largest chemical maker. It is separately exploring a potential acquisition of the US chemicals company Ashland.

Evonik Industries shares fell 1.2% in European trading Friday after the board’s rejection announcement.

Sources (2)

Topics

Priya AnandBusiness

Priya Anand explains business and finance for readers who suspect it is mostly footnotes and incentives — and are usually right. Dry-witted, deep in the mechanics, and quietly delighted by a clever piece of financial engineering.

Comments (0)