More than 600 people were fired or disciplined after posting online about the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk, according to a Reuters tally last November, creating a series of unresolved questions over free expression and workplace discipline.
Kirk, a 31-year-old conservative activist and co-founder of Turning Point USA, was fatally shot on 10 September while speaking at Utah Valley University. Public reaction quickly moved from social media into workplaces, as critics of Kirk faced calls for employers to identify and punish them.
The available record does not set out the policies employers relied on, the legal claims brought by former employees, or the number of people who have pursued court action. It also does not establish whether any case has created precedent on employment decisions tied to social media speech. Some workers who lost jobs have secured reinstatement or restitution, sometimes in the millions, while others have faced consequences extending beyond their employment.
Gerald Bourguet, who worked for PHNX Sports, posted criticism of Kirk hours after the shooting. He described Kirk as an 'evil man' and suggested that he had dedicated his life to hateful causes. PHNX Sports fired Bourguet.
Bourguet’s home address was later shared online, and he began receiving threatening text messages. He and his family left the state with their four-month-old before later relocating permanently. “My life will never be the same after this,” Bourguet said. “At age 35, I am having to start over in a lot of respects.”
The distinction between criticism, celebration of a killing and conduct that may breach an employer’s rules is central to the cases, although the information available does not say which rules, if any, were cited in the individual dismissals. It also does not provide the results of ongoing litigation or appeals.
Other cases illustrate the range of comments that prompted employer action. In Tennessee, anthropology professor Tamar Shirinian was suspended and later fired after a Facebook comment saying “the world is better off” without Kirk. A Delta Air Lines flight attendant was fired after posting “good riddance” in response to Kirk’s killing.
The dismissals came amid public pressure to report Kirk’s critics to their employers. Vice-President JD Vance said days after the assassination: “When you see someone celebrating Charlie's murder, call them out. And hell, call their employer”.
Laura Loomer, an influential right-wing commentator with nearly 2 million followers on X, warned Kirk’s critics to “prepare to have your whole future professional aspirations ruined”.
The White House drew a line around speech it described as support for political violence. Davis Ingle, a White House spokesperson, told the BBC: “Anyone who engages in or endorses political violence or assassination culture must be condemned in the harshest terms possible.”
The known outcomes show sharply different consequences for workers who posted about Kirk. Some have recovered jobs or won financial restitution. Others, including Bourguet, have described losing work alongside exposure of personal information and threats. The legal basis for the successful claims, the amounts awarded in particular cases and the ultimate outcome of any remaining disputes are unknown from the available information.
Comments (0)