The LBMA Gold Price benchmark is administered independently by ICE Benchmark Administration, while the London Bullion Market Association retains rights over the reference. A legal challenge has been filed against the London Good Delivery gold system, bringing accountability in that centuries-old system into focus.
The information available does not identify the party bringing the challenge, the allegations it makes, the stage of any proceedings or the outcome being sought. It also leaves unclear which governance practices are at issue and whether the case could affect gold trading or pricing.
The London Bullion Market Association represents the wholesale gold and silver market in London and develops its standards. London is one of the main global centres for precious-metals trading, and the market mainly operates over the counter, or OTC.
Its foundations predate the association itself. London began to consolidate as an international centre for precious-metals trading in the late 17th century. In 1750, the Bank of England created a list recognising refineries able to make bars to the market’s required standards. Daily gold-price fixing began in London in 1919.
The LBMA was created in 1987 with backing from the Bank of England. It now has members in numerous countries, with categories including full members and Market Makers. Market Makers must quote both buying and selling prices to one another during London trading hours.
At the centre of the challenge is the Good Delivery List, one of the LBMA’s most important responsibilities. The list accredits refineries whose bars meet strict standards for weight, purity, physical characteristics and quality. For gold, the reference wholesale bar is approximately 400 troy ounces. Accredited refineries must also meet responsible-sourcing requirements.
Gold pricing follows a separate mechanism. The LBMA Gold Price is set through an electronic auction involving authorised institutions. ICE Benchmark Administration administers that benchmark independently, although the LBMA holds the rights to the reference.
The filing places scrutiny on the accountability of a system built from London’s long-established bullion-market standards. The facts available so far leave the legal claims and their possible consequences unresolved.
Comments (0)