Wednesday, October 14Global edition

Fed minutes will show how officials weighed inflation before the jobs picture darkened

The record of the Federal Reserve's September meeting is due Wednesday. It captures a discussion held before weaker payroll data emerged — and may reveal how many more rate rises officials thought they needed.
The Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board building in Washington DC
Photo by Quang Vuong on Pexels
Share

When Federal Reserve policymakers met in September, the August payroll figure on their desks showed 162,000 jobs created and unemployment at 4.1%. On 2 October, after the vote, that August figure was revised to 133,000, July was recast as a loss of 10,000 jobs and September payrolls came in at 29,000, with unemployment at 4.2%.

The minutes of that meeting, due on Wednesday, 7 October at 2:00 p.m. Eastern time, will therefore record a discussion held before the weaker labour-market data emerged. They may give investors a clearer sense of how many further rate increases officials thought could be needed.

On 16 September, the Federal Open Market Committee voted 12-0 to lift the federal funds target range by a quarter of a percentage point to 3.75% to 4%. It was the first increase since July 2023.

The decision followed five consecutive meetings through July at which the committee left rates unchanged. Three cuts had occurred in late 2025.

That earlier pause had its dissenters. Beth M. Hammack, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Neel Kashkari, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, and Lorie K. Logan, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, each wanted a quarter-point increase at the July meeting.

September’s updated dot plot pointed to one more increase before year-end. Sixteen of the 18 participants saw at least one further increase as possible in 2026.

Inflation remains a concern for officials. Core personal consumption expenditures inflation held at 3.0% year over year in August, below forecasts, while officials have continued to warn that inflation is too high.

The language of the policy statements became starker. In July, the committee said elevated inflation reflected, in part, “supply shocks”; its September statement dropped that qualification and said simply that “inflation remains elevated.”

The minutes will show the deliberations behind the September vote and may identify the indicators officials regard as decisive for further tightening. They may also shed light on discussion of the real federal-funds rate, which some policymakers see as surprisingly accommodative.

Since then, markets have revised their view of the next meeting. John Williams, president of the New York Federal Reserve, spoke on Tuesday, and Federal Reserve Vice Chair Philip Jefferson spoke on Thursday. Both are senior officials close to Fed Chair Kevin Warsh, and each signalled that policymakers had time to assess the economy before considering another increase.

Before Williams spoke, federal funds futures put the chance of an increase at the Federal Open Market Committee’s 27-28 October meeting at 70 percent. By the time Jefferson finished, the probability was around 25 percent.

Warsh has spent his tenure telling investors not to expect a preview of the next interest-rate move. The minutes may offer detail on September’s reasoning, though they cannot settle how the committee will respond to the employment revisions that followed its vote.

The consumer price report due on 14 October could weigh heavily on the debate over further tightening.

Sources (2)

Topics

More from The Modern on this topic:

Daniel OseiMarkets

Daniel Osei takes the contrarian read on markets — the number everyone cites, and why it might mean the opposite. Sceptical by temperament, rigorous with the data, happiest puncturing a consensus.

Comments (0)