The board of trustees of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, chaired by President Trump and composed largely of his appointees, voted on 13 August 2026 to place his name on the building's marble facade. The decision came despite a federal court ruling that an earlier version of the same move violated the law, and a subsequent appellate panel refusal to allow it even temporarily.
The board voted to add an inscription reading 'The John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts Restored and Renovated By President Donald J. Trump' to the facade, according to Moneycontrol. It also voted to rename the open area in front of the building 'the President Donald J. Trump Plaza.'
Separately, the board voted to close the main building for approximately two years, projecting a reopening by summer 2028. The smaller REACH addition would remain open for limited programming during that period. The renovation is estimated to cost $250 million and would cover structural repairs, new marble flooring, and nearly $12 million in acoustical improvements.
The manoeuvre is a tactical shift. Rather than formally renaming the institution — which a federal judge has already ruled only Congress can do — the board is framing Trump's name as a renovation credit, carved beneath the Kennedy name. Whether courts will treat that distinction as legally meaningful is not yet known.
U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper ruled in May 2026 that adding Trump's name to the centre violated the federal law that established it as a memorial to President John F. Kennedy. He ordered the name removed. He also blocked an earlier board vote to close the building for two years, describing that vote as 'ill-informed and seemingly preordained.' His May ruling stated plainly: 'Congress gave the Kennedy Center its name, and only Congress can change it,' according to the BBC.
Trump's name was physically removed from the building in June 2026. A tarp has covered the relevant section of the facade since then, according to France 24.
The board appealed Judge Cooper's ruling and asked the appeals court to allow Trump's name to be restored while that appeal proceeded. In July 2026, a three-judge panel denied that request. The Associated Press reported that the panel found the board had failed to show irreparable injury and that its fundraising claims lacked specific facts or evidence.
The board's resolution described Trump as an 'unparalleled fundraiser and world-class developer,' according to Newser. It also stated the centre 'desires to recognize and honor President Trump's existential and unprecedented contributions to the survival of the center by all legal means,' according to Moneycontrol. The Washington Post, as cited by Newser, reported the board also voted to add a line reading 'Endowed by the Trump Kennedy Center Fund' to the facade if an endowment bearing Trump's name reaches $100 million. Whether that threshold has been met or is close to being met is not known.
Representative Joyce Beatty, an Ohio Democrat who sits on the board as an ex-officio member and who filed the original lawsuit challenging the name changes, said the 13 August vote is 'a transparent effort to circumvent the Court's ruling,' according to Newser.
The Kennedy Center dispute began in December 2025, when the board — reconstituted by Trump after he returned to office in January 2025 and appointed himself chairman — voted to rename the venue 'The Donald J. Trump and John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts.' That change was reversed by court order. The August votes represent the board's latest attempt to permanently associate Trump's name with the institution, this time through physical inscription rather than formal renaming, while simultaneously advancing the large-scale renovation that has itself drawn judicial challenge.
It is not known whether Judge Cooper will issue an emergency order blocking the new inscription before any physical work begins, nor whether the $250 million in renovation funding is fully secured or from what sources. The outcome of the wider appellate litigation over the name change also remains unresolved.
Comments (0)