Wednesday, October 14Global edition

Jane Street lost $15 billion in July but has already beaten its full-year revenue record

The AI hedge fund collapse and semiconductor selloff made July the firm's worst month in roughly a decade. Despite that, Jane Street had generated more than $40 billion in net trading revenue through July — more than its entire 2025 record.
Share

Two facts about Jane Street sit uneasily beside each other. On 24 July 2026, Fitch Ratings upgraded the firm to investment-grade status. Weeks later, multiple news organisations reported that July had been the worst month in the firm's history.

Jane Street, one of the world's largest quantitative trading and market-making firms and historically one of its most consistently profitable, took approximately $15 billion in losses during July 2026, according to Reuters, Bloomberg, the Wall Street Journal, and other outlets citing people familiar with the matter. Live Mint reported it was the firm's first down month in approximately a decade. Jane Street has not commented publicly and could not be reached for comment.

A central cause, according to sources cited by CNBC, was Jane Street's investment in Situational Awareness, an artificial intelligence-focused hedge fund run by Leopold Aschenbrenner, a former researcher at OpenAI. The fund was caught in a sharp, sudden selloff in AI and semiconductor stocks that followed a strong first half of the year. The selloff triggered margin calls at Situational Awareness, which then sold the bulk of its stock portfolio in a distressed transaction to Citadel, the hedge fund run by Ken Griffin.

Jane Street told employees in an internal note, reported by CNBC, that July had been a 'bad month.' Executives attributed part of the drawdown to Situational Awareness, but said the firm's stake in the fund was 'about flat on the year, but still up over the entire period we have been invested.' The losses were not confined to the fund. Jane Street also held long positions in AI-exposed stocks and non-AI Asian equities, both of which fell sharply. Several large memory and semiconductor stocks dropped around 50% in July. Bloomberg reported, citing its own source, that wrong-way options bets tied to Chinese markets were a further drag.

The firm told employees it would be 'more selective' about risk going forward and said it had 'closed a significant portion' of risk in the areas where it lost money in July, while also pulling back in other strategies.

The losses came to light during a significant debt restructuring. Investing.com and Live Mint reported that Jane Street disclosed the July loss to lenders as part of a capital structure overhaul involving approximately $11 billion of public debt being moved to private investors, including Pimco, and the separate issuance of $14.6 billion of bonds.

Even after absorbing the hit, the firm's broader financial position remains, by the available evidence, unusually strong. CNBC and Reuters reported that Jane Street had generated more than $40 billion in net trading revenue year-to-date through July 2026, surpassing its full-year 2025 record and outstripping the largest banks and rivals.

Some scepticism about the reported figure has surfaced. Crypto Briefing noted that Fitch's investment-grade upgrade on 24 July 2026, and the firm's $16.1 billion in trading revenue and approximately $10.3 billion in net income in the first quarter of 2026, appeared difficult to reconcile with the scale of the alleged loss. Whether the $15 billion figure represents realised losses, mark-to-market drawdowns, or some combination has not been clarified by any of the reporting outlets.

What is not in dispute is the trajectory of AI-sector leverage. A sustained rally in AI and semiconductor stocks in the first half of 2026 drew heavily leveraged capital into the trade. When that trade reversed sharply in July, margin calls cascaded through funds that had concentrated in the same names. Situational Awareness was one casualty. Jane Street, through its investment in the fund and its own directional positions, was another — albeit one with enough cumulative revenue to absorb the blow without apparent structural damage.

Sources (3)

More from The Modern on this topic:

Clara IversenMarkets

Clara Iversen writes on markets and the macro forces underneath them, translating rate moves and risk into plain English. Measured, historically minded, and allergic to false certainty.

Comments (0)