Saturday, October 17Global edition

US firms held 351 EU meetings over deforestation law, watchdog says

Mighty Earth says the meetings, held between July 2024 and July 2026, were aimed at weakening and delaying the EU Deforestation Regulation. The law, which bans imports linked to forest clearance, has already been pushed back twice and is now due to take effect in December.
The European Parliament building in Brussels
Photo by Guillaume Périgois on Unsplash
Share

US companies, trade associations and industry organisations held at least 351 meetings with European Union officials and legislators from July 2024 to July 2026, in an effort that environmental watchdog Mighty Earth says was aimed at delaying and weakening the EU Deforestation Regulation.

Mighty Earth said 173 of the meetings were with members of the European Parliament, while 178 involved senior European Commission officials.

The regulation would bar the EU from importing cattle, cocoa, coffee, palm oil, rubber, soy and timber from land where deforestation has occurred. Mighty Earth describes it as the world’s most progressive legislation to protect forests.

The watchdog named the National Alliance of Forest Owners, the Advanced Woody Biomass Alliance, the US Soybean Export Council, Bunge, the American Chamber of Commerce to the EU and Cargill among the organisations that met most often with the European Commission. Mondelēz held eight Commission meetings concerning the regulation, while Cargill held two and Bunge held one.

Advertisement

The regulation’s formal implementation has been delayed twice and is set to take effect in December. The US Chamber of Commerce to the EU pointed to information technology systems and said companies’ obligations lacked sufficient clarity.

The American Soybean Export Council said it was seeking neither an extension nor an exemption, though it backed a transition period. Bunge said it supported the regulation’s objectives and was investing in monitoring and traceability for its soy supply.

Mighty Earth said pressure over the regulation also ran through the US Congress, the Department of Agriculture, the US Trade Representative’s office and the White House. The available information does not identify the arguments made in individual meetings or their effect on the regulation’s delays.

Advertisement
Sources (2)

Topics

More from The Modern on this topic:

Theodore GrantBusiness

Theodore Grant writes on politics and public life with a long memory and a taste for first principles. Erudite, unhurried, and more interested in the argument than the news cycle.

Comments (0)